HN Showcase
Back to browse
TrustStack – Vendor Review with Evidence Pack, Diff and Approval Log

TrustStack – Vendor Review with Evidence Pack, Diff and Approval Log

by hodachi·Mar 3, 2026·1 point·0 comments
Visit ProjectView on HN

AI Analysis

●●SolidSolve My Problem

Vendor review with grounded evidence beats unattributed AI answers, but execution clarity and real usage data missing.

Strengths
  • •Evidence pack with citation chains forces accountability—'Unknown' flagging is honest, not hallucination hiding
  • •Diff-only renewal reports reduce review fatigue by surfacing deltas instead of re-reading entire contracts
  • •Approval log creates audit trail that regulators actually care about (not just logs, but decisions)
Weaknesses
  • •Demo URL uses synthetic data and temporary Azure hosting—no indication of production readiness or customer traction
  • •No pricing, ROI data, or comparison to existing vendor risk platforms (Vendr, Aptible, Secureframe)
Category
SaaS
Target Audience

Procurement teams, legal/compliance officers, vendor management teams

Similar To

Vendr · Secureframe · Aptible

Post Description

I'm working on a vendor review workflow where the output is not "an AI answer" but artifacts you can actually use:

- Evidence Pack (PDF) with citations for every claim - Diff report (what changed between contract versions) - Approval log (who approved what, based on which evidence)

If a claim can't be backed by evidence, it's marked Unknown.

Demo (synthetic data, no customer data): https://b2apps-hwbghfetgtamcmfb.japanwest-01.azurewebsites.n... Sample deliverables (PDF/MD): https://b2apps-hwbghfetgtamcmfb.japanwest-01.azurewebsites.n...

Questions: - In your process, where does most time go: collecting evidence, reviewing diffs, or getting approvals? - Would "questionnaire-only" (no sensitive docs) be useful as a first step?

Similar Projects