Gonfire – analyze Claude Code session logs to see how candidates think
Yet another coding assessment platform, but this one parses AI agent logs.
Claude Code & Codex Session Analytics
First analytics layer for Claude Code revealing 26% session abandonment rate.
Teams and individuals using Claude Code for development
So we built an analytics layer for it. After connecting our own sessions, we ended up with a dataset of 1,573 real Claude Code sessions, 15M+ tokens, 270K+ interactions.
Some things we found that surprised us: - Skills were only being used in 4% of our sessions - 26% of sessions are abandoned, most within the first 60 seconds - Session success rate varies significantly by task type (documentation scores highest, refactoring lowest) - Error cascade patterns appear in the first 2 minutes and predict abandonment with reasonable accuracy - There is no meaningful benchmark for 'good' agentic session performance, we are building one.
The tool is free to use and fully open source, happy to answer questions about the data or how we built it.
Yet another coding assessment platform, but this one parses AI agent logs.
Unified cost & activity tracking across 14 AI coding editors, local-only, no signup.
Sparklines, heatmaps, and chat replay for Claude Code—local, no data exfil.
Cross-agent workstreams with exact transcript binding beat native /resume.
Tames chaotic agent sessions with tabs and Kanban, but competes with Cursor.
Claude Code usage dashboard reading local files—fills exact gap Anthropic didn't address.