HN Showcase
Back to browse
Cross provider cost management layer

Cross provider cost management layer

by piosin·Jul 8, 2026·2 points·0 comments
Visit ProjectView on HN

AI Analysis

●●SolidSlickSolve My Problem

Agent cost controls before spending — MCP integration with Claude and Cursor.

Strengths
  • •Agents query budgets before acting — prevents runaway AI spending at the source
  • •FOCUS 1.2 standard normalizes AWS, Azure, GCP, SaaS, and per-model AI tokens
  • •Reads actual bills to find input/output/cache splits, not caching estimates
Weaknesses
  • •FinOps is crowded (CloudZero, Vantage, Kubecost) — needs stronger differentiation
  • •SaaS product with no self-hosted option limits trust for cost-sensitive teams
Category
Finance
Target Audience

Engineering teams managing cloud and AI infrastructure costs

Similar To

CloudZero · Vantage · Kubecost

Similar Projects

SaaS●●Solid

Read-only LLM cost observability

The read-only correlation of request → model → token → $ is smart — you get a shot at answering 'why did our bill spike?' without routing traffic through a proxy. It also claims workflow-level analysis (long prompts, retries, agent loops) and concrete recommendations like model routing and context trimming; useful, but the pitch leaves open how reliable the heuristics and team-attribution are across providers.

Solve My ProblemSlick
jappleseed987
204mo ago
Infrastructure●●Solid

I'm building an AWS cost CLI and need your feedback about it

It scans AWS for idle EC2/EBS/S3 artifacts and compares your month-to-date spend to the same window last month so you can spot anomalies fast. Rich terminal tables + structured JSON output and MFA-role support make it easy to drop into CI/CD or FinOps workflows, but the feature set overlaps heavily with existing tools like Cloud Custodian and Trusted Advisor.

Niche GemSolve My Problem
elC0mpa
114mo ago