Back to browse
A platform for objective developer skill assessment (MVP)

A platform for objective developer skill assessment (MVP)

by vitalyobolensky·Jul 21, 2026·2 points·1 comment

AI Analysis

MidShip It

LeetCode for theory questions, but the market is already saturated with interview prep tools.

Strengths
  • Covers non-algorithmic topics like system design and framework specifics often ignored by competitors.
  • Simulates real interview pressure with timed flows rather than just open practice.
Weaknesses
  • Content quality is the entire moat here, and there is no evidence of unique or superior question banks.
  • Hard to compete with established giants like Pramp or Interviewing.io without a novel angle.
Category
Target Audience

Junior to mid-level developers preparing for technical interviews

Similar To

Pramp · Interviewing.io · LeetCode

Post Description

Hi HN!

While preparing for interviews, I faced the problem that there was no tool for testing theory. We all use LeetCode for algorithmic sessions, but for theory we just use a list of questions on GitHub without any interactive part. So I created a tool to solve this problem.

App has an onboarding process where developers can select their role, level, programming language, and frameworks. Also, I made 2 flows: a free flow without any time restrictions, and a second that simulates a real interview process — a bunch of questions for a limited time.

Now my app is at the MVP stage, so I'm looking for feedback: would this flow be interesting for developers?

Thank you for your advice!

Similar Projects

EducationMid

SharpSkill – LeetCode Alternative with full-interview like journey

Stack-specific guided interview flows, timed validation tests and recruiter-facing shortlisting make this feel like a staged rehearsal rather than a bag of LeetCode problems. The inclusion of flashcards and per-tech progress tracking is practical, but the space is crowded—I'd need to see evidence (question sourcing, scoring transparency, placement stats) to call this a real differentiator.

SlickSolve My Problem
CocoZozo
205mo ago
Developer Tools●●●Banger

Oneprompt – Problem description to MVP (experimental)

This isn't just prompt chaining — it's a complete methodology baked into a Claude skill that actually closes the loop. The clever part: personas created during early research come back to usability-test the built app before launch, surfacing real UX friction that pure iteration never catches. It generates working Next.js apps with documented artifacts at every stage, which means you get both a product *and* the research trail proving it solves a real problem.

Big BrainZero to OneBold Bet
LambdaAndLatte
205mo ago