Back to browse
Infoseclist.com – Compare 90 cybersecurity tools ranked by practition

Infoseclist.com – Compare 90 cybersecurity tools ranked by practition

by aleks5678·Feb 13, 2026·1 point·1 comment

AI Analysis

●●SolidNiche GemSlickSolve My Problem
The Take

Two neat ideas here: dual scores (Market vs Value) and side‑by‑side comparisons with filters for compliance and team size — those make vendor shortlists usable instead of noisy. The tech is pragmatic: a Google Sheet served via a PHP CSV proxy and parsed client‑side keeps the CMS trivial, but that approach could become a scaling or trust bottleneck as the dataset and verification needs grow. Visually the site looks sharp, but the long game depends on how rigorously listings are vetted and updated.

Category
Target Audience

CISOs, CTOs, security engineers, procurement teams evaluating security tooling

Post Description

Hey HN, I built InfoSecList.com because I got tired of the way security teams evaluate tools.

Every time we needed a new DAST scanner or pentest vendor, it was the same drill: Google around, read SEO-optimized listicles written by people who never used the tools, sit through 3-5 sales demos, and hope for the best.

InfoSecList is a directory of 90+ cybersecurity tools and services across 21 categories. Every listing gets two scores from practitioners:

- Market Score (1-5): industry adoption and brand recognition - Value Score (1-5): actual value for money based on usage

You can browse by category (DAST, SAST, SCA, pentest services, bug bounty platforms, etc.), compare tools side-by-side, or look up alternatives to specific products.

A few things that might be interesting technically:

- Data lives in a Google Sheet, served via a PHP proxy as CSV, parsed client-side - Pages are dynamic SPA-style but with clean URLs for SEO - Each tool/alternative/category page generates its own structured data and meta tags from the CSV data at runtime - No framework, no build step. Plain HTML, CSS, vanilla JS

No accounts, no gated content, no pay-to-rank. Happy to answer any questions about the approach or the security tool landscape.

Stack: Apache, vanilla JS, Google Sheets as CMS, Let's Encrypt

Follow-up Comment (if asked about data/methodology)

The scores come from a combination of: - Gartner/Forrester positioning for Market Score - Community sentiment (Reddit, HN, security forums) for both scores - Direct practitioner feedback from CISOs and security engineers - Pricing transparency and free tier availability for Value Score

We deliberately keep it simple with two 1-5 scores rather than trying to build a complex weighted system. The goal is to help someone go from "I need a DAST tool" to a shortlist of 3-4 options in under 5 minutes.

Open source tools like Nmap, OWASP ZAP, and Trivy tend to score 5/5 on Value. Enterprise tools like CrowdStrike and Mandiant score 5/5 on Market but lower on Value due to pricing.

Follow-up Comment (if asked about business model)

Right now it's free with no monetization. Long term we're considering: - Featured listings (clearly marked, doesn't affect scores) - Lead gen for vendors (opt-in only, buyer initiates contact)

We won't do pay-to-rank. The scores stay independent.

Similar Projects

AI/MLMid

Compare Prices with SupplyFLare AI

Nice, search-focused UI with CSV upload and an explicit LTR angle — that specificity is promising for people who care about ranked pricing signals rather than raw scrape dumps. The site feels early (empty results, minimal onboarding and coverage notes), so the real question is whether their non-stationary-data approach to ranking actually beats simple heuristics at scale. If the ML pipeline and freshness guarantees are solid, this is useful to its niche; right now it's a tidy MVP.

Ship ItSlick
invar1ant
103mo ago