Free AI visibility diagnostic — may reveal uncomfortable truths
Yet another AI SEO tracker when BrightEdge, MarketMuse, and others already do this.

Smart, focused play: instead of chasing rankings, they add a machine-readable layer and server-rendered HTML so LLMs can actually see and cite product + review data. The landing shows concrete citation and traffic lift case studies and emphasizes zero visual change — sensible for conservative brands. It isn't reinventing structured data or SSR, though; the value hinges on execution details (how they extract, maintain JSON-LD for widget content, and map prompts to content), which the page glosses over.
Ecommerce brands, marketing/SEO teams, and digital agencies who want AI-driven discovery and referral traffic
AI agents were visiting their sites but not citing them.
The reason is structural. LLMs parse raw HTML and often skip JavaScript-rendered content. Reviews inside Yotpo or Judge.me widgets? Invisible. Product data buried in React? Frequently misread or skipped.
So you can rank well on Google and still barely exist in AI answers.
A few numbers that changed my view:
80% of URLs cited by ChatGPT do not rank in Google’s top 100 (Ahrefs)
ChatGPT referral traffic converts at 15.9% vs 1.76% for Google organic
AI referral traffic to US retail grew 4,700% YoY (Adobe, mid-2025)
We started building Mersel AI to address this. It adds a machine-readable layer on top of existing sites using structured data and server-side HTML. No visual changes. No redesign. We also write GEO-optimized content.
Early stage, a handful of paying brands, seeing 2 to 5x increases in AI citations in the first few weeks.
Curious if others here are seeing AI traffic behave differently from organic.
Yet another AI SEO tracker when BrightEdge, MarketMuse, and others already do this.
Yet another SEO auditor, but this one checks if LLMs can cite your site.
First GEO linter catches what AI agents actually cite. 92 automated rules for ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini.
GEO auditing is timely but SEO audit tools already dominate this space.
Multi-AI comparison extension when ChatHub and similar tools already exist.
The Potatometer nails a fun, focused angle: deterministic SEO checks plus an explicit 'GEO / AI visibility' score and support for modern signals like llms.txt and schema detection. The site promises instant, prioritized fixes (code snippets and time estimates) and a playful 'Potato Scale' that actually helps frame results for non-SEO folks. That said, the real value will hinge on how accurately its checks map to actual LLM citation behavior — the landing page shows confidence but stops short of proof or case studies.