Back to browse
Gatherly – E-signatures and doc collection for professional services

Gatherly – E-signatures and doc collection for professional services

by ivannovazzi·Feb 20, 2026·1 point·0 comments

AI Analysis

●●SolidSolve My ProblemSlick

eIDAS-qualified e-signatures plus document collection in one workflow, not two.

Strengths
  • Combines e-signature and intake in single session; most competitors split this into separate tools.
  • eIDAS compliance is real legal moat for EU firms; RFC 3161 timestamps and PKCS#7 export prove rigor.
  • Zero-friction UX: clients sign in via link, no account needed; auto-reminders handle follow-up.
Weaknesses
  • Document collection + e-sig is well-addressed by DocuSign, HelloSign, Legalzoom; not a novel problem.
  • Positioning on 'no chasing clients' is emotional, but workflow improvements alone don't justify premium over incumbents.
Category
Target Audience

Accountants, lawyers, consultants, financial advisors

Similar To

DocuSign · Hellosign · Legalzoom

Post Description

I built this after hearing the same complaint from accountants, lawyers, and consultants: they spend more time chasing clients for documents than doing actual work.

The pattern repeats everywhere — send a PDF, follow up three times, client sends it unsigned, follow up again, client sends the wrong document. The billing clock stops but the frustration doesn't.

Gatherly lets firms send a Secure Link to a branded Client Portal where clients sign and upload everything in one place. No client account required. Automated reminders handle follow-up until completion.

A few design decisions worth noting:

- Signatures are eIDAS-qualified (the EU legal standard for electronic signatures), which matters for law firms and financial advisors who need agreements that hold up legally - We combine e-signature with document collection in one workflow — so a client signs an engagement letter and immediately uploads supporting files in the same session, rather than two separate tools - Zero friction for the client side — they get a link, sign, upload, done. No account creation, no app to install

The thing I'm still figuring out: pricing model. Currently flat per-month with a free trial. Curious whether usage-based (per document request sent) or seat-based makes more sense for this kind of workflow tool.

Happy to hear from anyone who's worked in or built for professional services firms.

Similar Projects

SaaSMid

FolioDoc – I built a tool to stop chasing clients for documents

No-recipient login combined with SHA-256 hashed magic links and per-upload ClamAV scanning shows someone actually thought about real-world security and privacy tradeoffs. The product also offers white-labeling, EU hosting and a full audit trail — neat for regulated customers who care about compliance. Feels like a focused, practical tool rather than vaporware, though the space is crowded so enterprise integrations and pricing will decide adoption.

Niche GemSolve My ProblemSlick
Foliodoc
413mo ago