AI trading platform with 34% returns (3 months) – seeking acquisition
34% returns claimed; no methodology, backtesting warning, or independent audit shown.

Solo founder ML stock picker vs robo-advisors, but unproven strategy, undercapitalized infrastructure.
Individual retail investors seeking algorithmic stock picks without robo-advisor fees
Robo-advisors (Betterment, Wealthfront) · Factor-based ETFs (Vanguard factor suite)
The stack:
LightGBM gradient boosting for stock ranking (~30 min training) JAX PPO reinforcement learning for position sizing (~5.5 hrs training) 51 features: value metrics, momentum, quality factors, sentiment Walk-forward validation (no lookahead bias) PostgreSQL + FastAPI + React on a single Hetzner CCX33 (32GB RAM, 8 vCPU)
How it works: Every evening after market close, the pipeline runs: fetch EOD data, calculate ratios, refresh materialized views, retrain models, generate predictions, rebalance portfolios. Surgical daily updates (1-5 position changes) rather than full rebuilds.
Recent war story: Three weeks ago I had 19+ consecutive pipeline failures. Materialized views owned by postgres user blocked my acis user from refreshing. Cascade: stale technical indicators -> no PE/PB data -> broken ML features -> invalid predictions. Recovery required manual rebuilds of EMA, SMA, RSI, MACD for 1,700+ stocks. Lesson: monitor data freshness, not just job completion.
Results so far: 61 trading days tracked. Best strategy: +9% alpha vs SPY. Live performance data (updated daily): https://acis-trading.com/investor-reports
The model:
$99/month flat fee (vs ~$5,000/year at 1% AUM on $500K) You keep your money at your own brokerage Daily recommendations via API or web dashboard
Happy to answer questions about the ML architecture, pipeline design, or the business model.
34% returns claimed; no methodology, backtesting warning, or independent audit shown.
Real-time routing plus parallel-picking logic and per-shelf heatmaps is a sensible feature mix for dark stores — the UI shows concrete tools (heatmaps, layout recommendations, parallel order assembly) ops teams can actually act on. The pitch leans hard on a 70% travel reduction but gives no solver details or benchmarks; ask about datasets, how the planner handles blocked aisles/ congestion, and integration latency before committing.
Landing page promises revenue growth without code changes, but beta access only.
Investment newsletter performance benchmarking, but data is one year old and reproducibility unclear.
On-chain settlement + TradingView charts is clean, but 'full transparency' and decentralized trading are solved by dYdX, Hyperliquid.
Drop-in SaaS scaffolding with Stripe, JWT, Prisma, and Docker pre-wired for $19/project.