Turn .cursorrules / repo guidelines into GitHub pre-merge checks (OSS)
Semantic diff-to-issue alignment + agentic rule generation—solves real maintainer pain from Copilot volume.

Smarter than CODEOWNERS: workload-aware, expertise-aware, zero-config reviewer suggestions.
Engineering teams using GitHub who struggle with reviewer assignment and CODEOWNERS management
GitHub CODEOWNERS · GitKraken reviewer suggestion features
I built PullMaster to fix this. It's a GitHub App that analyzes your repo's actual history and recommends the best reviewer for each PR. It adapts to the risk level of each change, so critical PRs surface experienced reviewers while routine ones get distributed across the team.
Install the GitHub App and comment `@pullmaster-ai suggest` on a PR to get a recommendation with an explanation, or `@pullmaster-ai assign` to also request the review automatically. No configuration needed — it learns from your repo as soon as it's installed.
It's free. I'd use it at my day job but being in a heavily regulated industry without SOC 2 makes that a non-starter, so I'm looking for early users and feedback. Happy to answer questions about how it works.
Semantic diff-to-issue alignment + agentic rule generation—solves real maintainer pain from Copilot volume.
Free for open source, but Cursor and GitHub Copilot already review code.
Client-side avoids token leakage; star graphing is table stakes, caching is nice.
GitHub Actions wrapper for AI workflows with cost analytics, but Copilot already automates PRs.
Claude in GitHub Actions with inline comments, but Codiumai and others already own this niche.
GitHub PRs to performance reviews with local Ollama support for privacy.