Verifiable Interaction Records for Agents
Standardizes portable cryptographic receipts for agent behavior—but adoption unclear, overlaps Nobulex heavily.

Civ-style tech tree for AI agent standards—good explainer, but presentation over substance.
AI/ML engineers, policy makers, standards researchers
Roadmaps like OpenAI o1/o3 capability trees · Standards documentation sites like webassembly.org
I made this tool as an alternative to a slide deck for a conference on AI agents that included both policy/regulatory folks and tech folks -- I wanted something for the policy side that shows the complexity of the decentralized community behind AI agents and why regulating them is a messy topic; and for the tech side that would let you see what the actual tech is beneath the jargon.
I'd love to know what you think I got right or wrong. There's a bunch of ways to organize and structure this story, how various competing incentives are driving people to agree on common frameworks and ways of doing things. I'm curious how you would tell the story differently and what tech out on the right edge you think is coming up.
Tool: https://harvard-lil.github.io/agent-protocols/ Blog post: https://lil.law.harvard.edu/blog/2026/02/23/agent-protocols-... Code: https://github.com/harvard-lil/agent-protocols/
Standardizes portable cryptographic receipts for agent behavior—but adoption unclear, overlaps Nobulex heavily.
Research thesis on agent protocols when everyone's already building agent infrastructure.
One UI format across all platforms; 97% token savings vs JSON for LLM agents.
Ambitious vision for agent payments, but shipping credibility unclear; blog post, no working product or API.
Portable signed proof for AI agent interactions solves real auditability gaps.
A2A + MCP agent marketplace, but the whole category is pre-revenue speculation.