MCP tools do parallelize in Claude Code (study with raw data)
Benchmarks readOnlyHint's impact on MCP parallelism, but archived before yielding actionable best practices.
A Python toolkit for studying AI agent behavior without looking inside the model.
Behavioral field approximation via trajectory sampling; clever framing, limited adoption signals.
AI researchers, agentic system developers studying agent behavior shifts
It gives the tools to measure the changes in "behaviors that the users define". This means that it is more like a hypothesis testing framework for what the agent is doing over actually telling what the agent might do.
The reasoning and derivations behind these tools is given over here https://technoyoda.github.io/agent-science.html
Would be very happy to hear feedback and questions. (Please ignore the names given to theorization, it was for shits and giggles)
Benchmarks readOnlyHint's impact on MCP parallelism, but archived before yielding actionable best practices.
Defines agents as YAML specs and provides a simple CLI + Python API so you can iterate on agent behavior without committing to a heavyweight framework. It supports many model providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Mistral, Bedrock, etc.) and includes Colab examples and a quickstart, which makes experimenting frictionless — but it deliberately avoids workflow/orchestration features, so it’s clearly aimed at prototyping rather than production-grade agent pipelines.
GPU-vectorized PPO arena with thousands of agents, but emergent behavior research remains niche.
Accessibility tree beats screenshot tokens, per-step model control is genuinely clever.
Error registry catches stuck agent loops before they waste hours of compute.
MCP server integration for AI agents to detect anti-bot defenses before scraping.