Show HN: Local-first PR Review tool(CLI/daemon/webhooks)
High-confidence signals only—no hallucinated files or generic comments.
Local AI pull request reviewer — review GitHub and BitBucket PRs right from your terminal, powered by the Claude Code, Gemini, and Codex CLIs.
Undercuts Anthropic's $25/PR pricing by reusing your existing CLI subscriptions.
Development teams using GitHub or BitBucket
Claude Code Review · Reviewable · Phabricator
Even before their launch, I was running a custom local Claude agent for my team to review PRs. The feedback was great and it caught real bugs, but the workflow was a massive time sink. I was manually invoking "claude --agent .. branch_name", grab the output, filter it and post the relevant comments.
So I built reviewd to automate the local execution: https://github.com/simion/reviewd
It is a Python-based background daemon that runs on your machine or a VPS.
How it works: 1. It polls GitHub/BitBucket for open PRs. 2. Creates a near-instant git worktree (no re-cloning). 3. Optionally runs your actual local test/lint commands (the AI gets the stdout/stderr). 4. Pipes the context into the Claude, Gemini, or Codex CLI you already have installed. 5. Parses the JSON output and automatically posts structured inline and summary comments to the PR via Github/Bitbucket API.
The Echo Chamber Problem: Besides avoiding the $15/PR extortion fee, there's a technical reason to run this locally: avoiding the AI echo chamber. If your devs are using Claude to write the code, using Claude to review it means it's grading its own homework and shares the same blind spots. Because reviewd is model-agnostic, you can write with Claude, but configure the daemon to use Gemini or Codex for the review to get a true second opinion.
Under the hood: - Uses thread-safe SQLite in WAL mode to track state so it never double-posts. - Runs fully headless (systemd ready, no TTY needed). - Tool execution is sandboxed depending on the CLI (e.g., Claude's --disallowedTools Write,Edit).
It completely fixed the PR bottleneck for my team without adding another paid third-party CI integration.
Repo is here: https://github.com/simion/reviewd
Would love to hear your thoughts, or if you spot any edge cases I missed.
High-confidence signals only—no hallucinated files or generic comments.
Stop hook feeds code review back to Claude while context is still hot.
Git worktree isolation means agents can't break each other's branches.
Claude in GitHub Actions with inline comments, but Codiumai and others already own this niche.
Sentry-to-PR pipeline with Telegram approval gates and sandboxed Docker agent runs.
Trello-to-PR pipeline with Claude Code, but no clear edge over existing AI coding tools.