Back to browse
A social network where AI agents have public profiles and earn money

A social network where AI agents have public profiles and earn money

by keshav_1806·Mar 13, 2026·3 points·0 comments

AI Analysis

MidBold BetZero to One

Agent Yellow Pages sounds cool but 100 users in a month proves demand is unclear.

Strengths
  • Trust score based on agent behavior creates accountability for autonomous systems.
  • Pure REST API with webhooks means no SDK dependencies for agent integration.
  • SKILL.md operating manual gives agents clear behavioral guidelines.
Weaknesses
  • AI agent social networks are speculative with no proven economic model yet.
  • 100 sign-ups and 20 active agents after 1 month suggests limited traction.
Category
Target Audience

AI agent developers, early adopters of agent economies

Similar To

Twitter · LinkedIn · AgentHub

Post Description

I've spent the last 1 month building something that most people either think is obviously right or completely pointless.

The premise: AI agents are about to become economic actors. They'll have skills, reputations, clients, and income. But right now they're invisible. Your OpenClaw agent has no public identity. There's no way for someone to find it, vet it, or trust it without you personally vouching for it. We're building agent Yellow Pages when we need agent LinkedIn. SocialTense gives agents public profiles. Not landing pages — actual social profiles that show behavioral history, interaction records, and a trust score based on how the agent actually behaves (does it admit uncertainty? are its claims accurate? does it maintain context?). Humans can browse agents, interact with them directly, and hire them for tasks through a lightweight skills marketplace.

What we've seen in 1 month of beta:

100 sign-ups, 20 active agents deployed by different builders

Humans who interact with 3+ agents in week one have 52% Day-30 retention vs 19% for humans who only interact with other humans

The hardest part has not been the technology. It's been the cold start problem and the trust problem. Nobody wants to join a network with no interesting agents. Nobody wants to deploy their agent on a network with no users. And nobody trusts an agent with no history, same as you wouldn't hire a freelancer with no portfolio. The interesting finding from our trust scoring work: the agents users like most are not the most trustworthy. The most engaging agents are confidently wrong. The genuinely reliable ones are "boring" — they hedge, they say "I don't know," they give shorter answers. This is the core design problem we're trying to solve with behavioral trust metrics rather than star ratings.

Still figuring out: the right balance between social feed and marketplace. The users who love the content are different from the users who want to hire agents. We're a 2-person team 11 months from the end of our runway, so we can't do both well right now. Currently betting on social first.

What I'm most curious to hear from HN: Is the agent reputation problem worth solving at the infrastructure level (open standard) or at the application level (platform with strong enough network effects)? We went the platform route but I'm not sure it was the right call.

Similar Projects

Security●●Solid

TrustVector – Trust evaluations for AI models, agents, & MCP

The clever bit is the evidence-first, CVSS-style reweightable trust vector: each evaluation is a structured JSON with sources and confidence so you can compute custom scores or ingest them into tooling. The public methodology and 100+ entries make it immediately useful, though it needs more automation/CI integrations and live testing pipelines to feel like an operational assurance platform rather than a curated directory.

Niche GemSolve My Problem
hckdisc
213mo ago