Back to browse
Got tired of AI copilots just autocompleting, and built Glass Arc

Got tired of AI copilots just autocompleting, and built Glass Arc

by Conquer01·Mar 14, 2026·4 points·2 comments

AI Analysis

●●SolidShip ItSolve My Problem

Fixes runtime crashes autonomously and undercuts Cursor's $20 monthly subscription model.

Strengths
  • Runtime auto-heal intercepts stack traces and injects fixes without manual prompts.
  • Pay-as-you-go credit system avoids the standard $20/month AI subscription tax.
  • Multiplayer deep links sync team VS Code sessions for collaborative architecture reviews.
Weaknesses
  • Crowded market with Cursor and Copilot Workspace already dominating agentic coding.
  • Auto-healing logic risks infinite loops or incorrect patches without human oversight.
Target Audience

Software developers frustrated with passive AI autocomplete tools

Similar To

Cursor · GitHub Copilot Workspace · Continue

Post Description

Hey HN,

Over the last few months, I realized I was paying $20/month for an AI that essentially just acts as a really good autocomplete. It waits for me to type, guesses the next block, and stops. But software engineering isn't just writing syntax, it's managing the file system, running terminal commands, and debugging stack traces.

So I pivoted my project and built Glass Arc. It’s an agentic workspace that lives directly inside VS Code.

Instead of just generating text, I gave it actual agency over the local environment (safely):

1. Agentic Execution: You give it an intent, and it drafts the architecture across multiple files, managing the dependency tree and running standard terminal commands to scaffold the infrastructure.

2. Runtime Auto-Heal: This was the hardest part. When a fatal exception hits the terminal, Glass Arc intercepts the stack trace, analyzes the crash context, writes the fix, and injects it.

3. Multiplayer: Generates a secure vscode:// deep-link so you can drop it in Slack and sync your team's IDEs into the same live session.

4. Pay-as-you-go: I scrapped the standard $20/mo SaaS model. It runs on a credit system—you only pay when the Architect is actively modifying your system. (Signing in via GitHub drops 200 free credits to test it out).

I’d love for you to try to break it, test the auto-healing, and tear apart the architecture. What am I missing?

Live on the VS code Marketplace, Install: https://www.glassarc.dev/

Similar Projects

Developer Tools●●Solid

Assign tasks to 7 AI agents with -mentions, autonomous mode, OpenClaw

Mysti makes multi-model coding workflows tangible: you can inline-route tasks with @-mentions and have agents execute a pipeline where each one gets the previous output, plus auto-retries for failures. The OpenClaw daemon, WebSocket streaming, status-bar provider switching, and autonomous/semi-autonomous modes show this is more than a toy — it aims to make cross-model review and debate a practical part of your edit loop. The real test will be subscription/config friction and whether multi-agent noise actually improves real-world code quality, but the feature set is a smart, ambitious bet.

Big BrainSlick
bahaAbunojaim
123mo ago