Social proof works 2-7x better on AI shopping agents than humans
Social proof exploits AI shoppers harder than humans—88% susceptibility to review counts.

Another AI-augmented sales course in a sea of identical LinkedIn guru offerings.
Small business owners and solopreneurs doing outbound sales
Alex Hormozi courses · Justin Welsh's content · Navah Hopkins' lead gen frameworks
The core of this experiment is a collaborative "do-and-learn" loop where the agent executes a proven, high-stakes lead generation methodology, and the human provides the "judgment" layer.
This is an ambitious experiment exploring a few points:
Judgment vs. Execution: Humans learn good judgment through direct experience, failures, and working through problems. If we offload the doing to an agent, how do we build human-level judgment in the loop? Recursive Skill Building: Moving beyond simple Chain-of-Thought or generic skills. Can an agent document, refine, and store their own processes as they execute based on feedback? Training via Methodology: Using a proven, multi-million dollar revenue lead-generation methodology as the training data to see if an agent can move from instruction-follower to process-owner.
I’d love feedback on the architecture of the agent loops and how others are handling the "education" of their agents in complex, multi-day task or research cycles.
Social proof exploits AI shoppers harder than humans—88% susceptibility to review counts.
Multi-method decision framework, but spreadsheets and Notion templates already do this.
Forces you to make design decisions before coding, unlike Cursor which just writes code.
Complete GPU language, not a shader wrapper—150 embedded kernels, zero SDK.
Seven years of solo work building effect-typed WASM between Rust and TypeScript.
Curated prompt library for founders, but generic AI chat already covers most of this.