Anonymous Dead Man's Switch
Dead Man's Switch with Mullvad-style anonymous accounts and 128-bit entropy.

Client-side encryption before server touch is the right call for dead man's switches.
People planning end-of-life messages or legacy communications
Dead Man's Switch · FutureMe · SafeBeyond
Now it is up... It can send messages, it can let you record messages/voice, video... It encrypts messages in the browser with personalised key and it let you even set a password to further protect the message (unrecoverable if you forget it as password never send back to my server).
Well... I did it, I have an app after a few days and I want to make it free/pay as you want for people to send messages/voice, video to love ones beyond the grave but now I have no idea if it would be practical for me to host it and who would even trust a random person's vibe coded app on internet... And how can I keep it running even after I die lol ... What do you think? Any advice?
Dead Man's Switch with Mullvad-style anonymous accounts and 128-bit entropy.
Genuinely useful safety net, but execution hinges on email delivery reliability.
The UX is delightfully minimal — one big "I'm OK" button, configurable guardians, and a check-in window — and the author leaned on Claude Code plus multi-role LLM reviews to shore up gaps in their Swift work, which is an interesting workflow experiment. The privacy-forward touches shown on the landing page (encrypted, no GPS) are promising, but critical backend details and delivery guarantees are missing, and the core idea is familiar rather than novel.
Dead man's switch plus spend controls solve a real AI agent safety gap nobody else addresses.
Dead man's switch for solo living, but invite-only beta limits validation.
Solves $120B Bitcoin inheritance problem with USB-only, one-time payment model.