Back to browse
Built a Cursor for Product Managers

Built a Cursor for Product Managers

by ameyakhot·Mar 5, 2026·2 points·1 comment

AI Analysis

MidBold BetBig Brain

Four-agent council for PM planning, but YC already funds dozens of 'AI for PMs' tools.

Strengths
  • Multi-agent deliberation concept is genuinely thoughtful—architect, backend, frontend, QA 'cross-talk' mirrors real planning discussions.
  • Code citations with path:line format and reflexion loops suggest serious engineering rigor, not just ChatGPT wrapping.
  • Integration pipeline (GitHub, Fireflies, Jira; more coming) shows understanding of PM workflows.
Weaknesses
  • v0 beta with vague traction signals; 'will be improved a lot' reads as early-stage and unfocused.
  • Crowded category: Linear, Jira, Notion all adding AI planning features; unclear why this council is better than existing tools' native AI.
Category
Target Audience

Engineering product managers, engineering leads planning feature roadmaps

Similar To

Linear AI assistant · GitHub Copilot for Planning · Notion AI summaries

Post Description

I've been working on this since the beginning of my discovery of llm-council by @karpathy. I've also built domain-specific deep agents and also built the autonomous explore and plan agents that work well to find next features. This is a very small beta version and will be improved a lot. This is v0

Similar Projects

Productivity●●Solid

Productmap – local-first visual product planning for humans and agents

Uses a smart, file-first approach — every task lives as markdown/json in a project folder so agents and humans can both read and mutate state. The recursive canvas + draggable, resizable cards is a familiar mental model, but the per-task Claude Code sessions and automatic terminal prompts are the standout: it treats LLM context as a first-class part of the workflow. Missing obvious collaboration/sync features, but as a local, agent-aware planning tool it scratches a very specific itch.

Niche GemWizardry
andrewchilds
203mo ago
SaaS●●Solid

Motionode – Cursor for Technical Planning

They split the work smartly: an LLM extracts deliverables from messy docs, then a deterministic 'physics' engine computes dependencies, capacity-based timelines, and a defendable critical path. Client-ready SOW PDFs, a scope-change ledger, and on-the-fly what-if scenarios feel immediately useful; I'd want to see proof it integrates cleanly with existing PM tooling and handles truly noisy inputs.

Big BrainSolve My ProblemSlick
oscarcaldera
203mo ago