Back to browse

SkeptAI – adversarial reasoning agent that challenges LLM outputs

by datonpope·Mar 17, 2026·3 points·2 comments

AI Analysis

●●●BangerBig BrainSolve My ProblemZero to One

Cross-model adversarial critique catches hallucinations before you forward them to clients.

Strengths
  • Four structured passes with scored verdicts, not just a single sanity check.
  • Claude output challenged by GPT-4o prevents self-referential bias in critiques.
  • Free playground plus open source framework means you can actually audit the logic.
Weaknesses
  • AI verification tools exist (FactCheck, various validators) — needs clearer differentiation.
  • No mention of latency or cost for running four model passes per output.
Category
Target Audience

Developers and consultants who rely on LLM outputs for client work

Similar To

FactCheck · Guardrails AI · LangChain validators

Post Description

I built this after Claude cited an API feature that doesn't exist in a work analysis that I almost forwarded to a client. CRIT (the custom framework that I built behind it) runs four structured adversarial passes on any LLM output and delivers a scored verdict. Cross-model critique (Claude output gets challenged by GPT-4o and vice versa) to prevent self-referential bias. Free playground, open source framework. Think of it as a "Digital Devil's Advocate". Check it out and let me know what you think. skeptai.dev | github.com/datonpope/skeptai

Similar Projects

AI/ML●●Solid

A Write Barrier That Blocks Structural Collapse in LLM Reasoning

Append-only lineage prevents LLM outputs from collapsing structure—but unclear if it ships or works.

Big BrainWizardry
persistentVlad
113mo ago