Back to browse
GitHub Repository

Shared memory across your team and your AI agents — with judgment about what's worth keeping.

74 starsTypeScript

VetoBench – benchmarking AI memory beyond retrieval

by mart1adelina·Jul 8, 2026·2 points·0 comments

AI Analysis

●●●BangerBig BrainSolve My Problem

Tracks rejected decisions so agents stop proposing approaches your team already vetoed.

Strengths
  • Structured veto storage prevents agents from proposing approaches the team already rejected.
  • VetoBench shows agents repeat rejected decisions nine out of ten times without memory.
  • Passive capture works with Cursor and Copilot without requiring manual tagging workflows.
Weaknesses
  • Self-hosted Postgres and Docker setup adds ops overhead for small teams.
  • Relies on agents respecting system prompt instructions to check the veto store.
Target Audience

Engineering teams using AI coding agents like Cursor or Copilot

Similar To

Mem0 · Letta · Zep

Post Description

VetoBench is an open-source benchmark that measures whether AI agents repeat engineering decisions a team has already rejected. Instead of evaluating retrieval accuracy, it evaluates decision quality: does the agent propose a previously vetoed approach, and does it recognize when a memory is no longer valid? Everything is reproducible, including the benchmark, fixtures, and evaluation results. Feedback is very welcome.

Similar Projects

AI/ML●●Solid

Agentic Intent Benchmark

First benchmark testing structured requirements on complex greenfield agent tasks.

Niche GemBig Brain
ryan4rtmx
201mo ago